@wowaname yes like that part where he said pedophilia is okay, dude is extremely consistent

@wowaname https://stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html "fucking children is fine as long as you don't coerce them, lol" -rms

@sneak hes pointing out that the definition of consent is so poorly defined in law and that the "think of the children" fallacy was used to repress any further debate on whether children are mentally capable of consent in any situation

face it, some adults arent even capable of consent. who the hell turned this into a thing about children specifically?

@sneak if you were looking for me to bash paedophiles with you then you picked the absolute wrong person. i have no moral position on paedophilia, since i consider it separate from sexual abuse

@sneak also the fact that AoC is not universally agreed upon should be your first red flag that the notion of "child" isnt even one we have properly defined

@wowaname ahh yes this is all very consistent and rigorous as you have previously promised. i bow to your superior logical reasoning skills.

@wowaname you are clearly the superior evaluator and have reached the superior conclusion that diddling kids is okay because of the impeccable argument "laws aren't the same everywhere!" it's amazing nobody else has thought of this clearly accurate and correct logical evaluation before

@wowaname i will be sure to consult with you in the future if i ever have trouble working out some logical reasoning. i hope you don't mind that i saved your contact info in the event i should ever need to call on you. it's under 'k', 'k' for kid-diddler

@sneak ease the sarcasm a bit, here, have some lolis
180d318a33861bbc146fb4004301e45…

@wowaname @sneak W e w

@sneak
I didn't realise rms was this based. Time to replace that picture of Hitler I have hanging up.
@wowaname

@sneak Drink the kool aid a little faster... Why even try to misrepresent his comment? and you call opal a "kiddie diddler" without even a second thought.