TIL that software that is GPL 3 is not GPL enough for rms to make a dep of emacs (lolllll):
https://lwn.net/ml/emacs-devel/E1jPGhC-0003i1-W4@fencepost.gnu.org/
@kick GPL2 is more than free enough for any reasonable person
@kick i disagree. i think everything after gpl2 is just stallman's anticapitalistic bent, including and especially the AGPL. software freedom isn't communism and people are still entitled to keeping their own patches secret/private.
@kick AGPL absolutely stops you from keeping patches private the moment you run /etc/init.d/apache start